Misconduct by Housing Supervisor and Atty LaRovere Must Be Prosecuted

 A First Amendment right to expose bad actors, public figures.

The Prosecution of Nicoie DiPierro, Atty Francis Larovere,

Pastor Jean Daniel, Brian Arrington and Steven Kergo

My rent check goes into attorney Fran LaRovere's

pocketbook.  Put lipstick on him, a purse and

a woman's dress and let him prostitute himself

on an Everett street corner; 

 

it would be more honest than

his abusing a rent-paying handicapped senior!!!

Their magic wand, an allegedly corrupt ex mayor Carlo DeMaria, is

gone.

Now Nicole DiPierro can be prosecuted to the full extent

of the law for the crime of elder abuse, and other misdeeds.

There have been four incidents with my parking space 

at Whittier Dr, #7.  One of them is being prosecuted in

criminal court.    As Will Smith said in I Robot as the

robots attacked him and his fellow officers didn't believe

him: I CAN'T BE THIS UNLUCKY

This elder can't be this unlucky, the abuse of my parking space

is reflecting the insanity of Nicolle DiPierro violating the 

Quiet Enjoyment law screaming and yelling in my apartment

building like a refugess from an insane asylum

What kind of unbalanced woman, allegedly very unpopular

in high school, raging uncontrollably with witnesses at

a senior's building?

How do we elders get protection from a Steve Kergo who

allows an unlicensed gambling casino and alleged drug dealer

underneath the same senior?

Or a Jean Daniel lying about a phone call to Housing on

Dec 24, 2024 for help, when the phone number was right

on my phone and Daniel couldn't look the abused elder

in the eye.

When a maintenance person, Brian Arrington, steals your

space, says that he can take it, taunts an elder that he is paid

to serve while my groceries were in my car, laughing like

that smirking hyena Nicole DiPierro, laughing and waving

and mocking a senior, and then they lie about their repugnant

behavior and call any complaint on their misconduct "harassment,"

IT IS INCUMBENT ON US TO REMOVE

THESE DESPICABLE INDIVIDUALS WHO

ENJOY ABUSING WEAKER PEOPLE IN

THE ELDER COMMUNITY.

it is obligatory, it is our duty to bring

the rogue element at Housing to justice.

What kind of individual considers himself

a "pastor" and lies about a senior because

his boss tells him to?

I'm handling the rogue attorney through

the proper channels.  Churning, keeping

a case alive to take monies when a judge

was pleading with Atty LaRovere to end

the case on Jan 29, 2026 in Woburn,

blackmailing a senior - taunting him that

if he drops his legitimate cases he can

have his PCA

Who does that to seniors?

They do not want me to have a witness

to their misconduct.  They deny me

simple services, months to get a new

window shade; no lighting in the back 

hall, which I blame Jean Daniel and

Nicole DiPierro for, no lighting for 

months - a very dangerous situation

in a fire, and their refusal to fix my

lights for months on end, after my

complaints to them.

Quid Pro Quo?  No one can believe

DiPierro and LaRovere, they are liars,

abusers, and they need to be removed

I am not a lawyer, but I have been very

effective having Governor Deval Patrick

remove an uncle of a Medford Mayor.

Nicole is no longer related to the mayor,

her cousin was removed by the voters

and is battling the Inspector General

I submit and allege that Fran LaRovere

refuses to do what a judge requested because

he is taking my rent for his own personal gain.

Does his son who works for him know what

an unethical bastard his old man is?

"Churning" by an attorney—the practice of intentionally padding bills 

or engaging in unnecessary work to generate higher fees—

is considered a violation of ethical rules in Massachusetts. 

Under Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.5, 

a lawyer is prohibited from charging or collecting "clearly excessive" fees. 

Here is a breakdown of how this is handled, along with legal resources in Massachusetts:

What Constitutes Churning/Excessive Fees

• Definition: "Churning" or "featherbedding" involves performing unnecessary tasks, over-staffing cases, or delaying resolution to increase billable hours.
• Rule 1.5: This rule states that a lawyer's fee must be reasonable, and fees that are "clearly excessive" are prohibited.
• Examples: The court may find fees inappropriate if they are deemed "excessive" in relation to the work performed. 

Legal Options and Resources in Massachusetts

If you believe a lawyer has churned your case, you have several avenues for recourse:

• Fee Arbitration: The Massachusetts Bar Association provides a Lawyer Referral Service that may be able to assist with disputes (617-654-0400).
• File a Complaint: The Office of Bar Counsel and the Board of Bar Overseers (BBO) are responsible for enforcing ethical rules and can handle complaints against attorneys.
• Legal Malpractice Attorney: If the excessive billing caused significant financial damage, you may need to consult a lawyer who specializes in legal malpractice to sue for damages.
• Small Claims/Courts: Disputes regarding excessive fees can be brought before a court, particularly in cases involving breach of contract or fiduciary duty. 

Key Contact Information

• Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers (BBO): Handles complaints against attorneys for unethical behavior.
• Massachusetts Bar Association Lawyer Referral Service: 617-654-0400.
• MassLegalHelp: Provides resources for understanding your rights. 

Signs of Churning

• Multiple attorneys billing for the same task.
• Extensive time spent on simple tasks.
• Unnecessary delays in case resolution. 

For specific advice on a case, contacting a malpractice attorney or the BBO is recommended. 

 

  

Joe Viglione